Bozeman Blitz- Issue 1

Have you ever had the experience where you’re listening to someone speak, trying to understand what they’re saying, but once they finish the best you’ve got is a blank stare because you don’t know wtf they just said? That’s kinda what it feels like sitting in on a city commission meeting for the first time. 

Every month I will try to bring you a new, different perspective on the Bozeman city commission and the business happening before it. This month, I want to dive into what the commission does and why it’s important. We’ll look at Bozeman’s “style” of government, resolutions and ordinances that come before the commission, and the scope the commission can cover. 


Strong Mayor v. Weak Mayor

Most people probably have a pretty good grasp on how federal or state governments function. What most people don’t understand (myself included) is how local governments can function. 

There are two common types of government structure for localities, commonly known as a “strong mayor” or “weak mayor.” In a strong mayor system, the mayor has direct administrative authority over the city and its departments, whereas in a weak mayor system, a city manager is appointed and oversees those administrative duties. 

Any guesses on what style of government the city of Bozeman has? (Bueller? Bueller? Bueller?)

Bozeman operates under a weak mayor form of government, meaning there is an appointed city manager. The city manager oversees all of the administrative duties of the city of Bozeman’s government while the mayor acts as a figurehead for the city and as another Commission member. (There is a prize to whoever can send me the names of our commission members and city manager first!)

Bozeman has a five person city commission responsible for conducting city business. Most ordinance proposals or plans that come before the city require a majority vote in order to implement or move forward.. Now you might be asking yourself, WTF is an ordinance??


Resolutions v. Ordinances

When the city commission is in session, they will usually hear plans from developers about upcoming development projects, such as information about the ongoing parking issue, lately there has been a big emphasis on “urban camping.” So how does the city pass meaningful policies that will address these concerns? It usually comes in the form of an ordinance or a resolution. But what is the difference between the two?

You can think of an ordinance as a local law. It’s something that the city commission can pass that is enforced within city limits as long as it follows the rules set by the legislature. For example, the city just passed an ordinance that bans the use and sale of fireworks within city limits (unless you have the proper permit). The city has the authority to do this since no Montana laws prevent cities from passing firework bans. If the legislature was to come back into session and pass a state law that said cities can’t pass firework bans for reason x, y, and z then, the city’s ordinance would be repealed.

Now, a resolution is oftentimes a little more for show than to accomplish a policy goal. It’s more of an expression of the city’s opinion on something to try and encourage specific behavior. This usually happens in circumstances of laws that the city doesn’t have the authority to enforce or oversee. This can generally be politically charged and lately has been used in response to unfriendly laws passed by the state legislature. The city will write, hear, and pass resolutions that condone the laws passed by the legislature since there isn’t anything else they can do about it (other than draw attention to them!) One example is how the city adopted its City for CEDAW resolution last year, showing solidarity and a commitment to eliminating violence against women, girls, and trans folks.

In some instances, resolutions can accomplish policy goals. For example, in Bozeman, when there are annexations or zone map amendments, they are passed via resolutions. In this way, resolutions are also tools to implement city policy, whereas an ordinance creates a new policy (law) or amends an existing one and often includes a mechanism for enforcement.

In some instances, resolutions can accomplish policy goals. For example, in Bozeman, when there are annexations or zone map amendments, they are passed via resolutions. In this way, resolutions are also tools to implement city policy, whereas an ordinance creates a new policy (law) or amends an existing one and often includes a mechanism for enforcement.


Commission Scope 

I’ve already touched on a few things  the commission talks and makes decisions about. But let’s dive a little deeper into it… 

The Bozeman city commission has the authority to create ordinances that are laws within city limits. They oversee developments that are proposed to be built within city limits, and they have the power to annex property into city limits (expanding the size of the city). The city tackles issues affecting residents, like a lack of parking, failing streets, and unaffordable housing. Additionally, in an effort to provide direction to a growing city, Bozeman has developed action plans, including a climate action plan, a growth plan, and community housing action plan. 

The city commission has the ability to better the life of its residents through ordinances but only within the scope that the MT legislature sets. They’ll listen to development plans and manage the city’s growth based on their action plans.

There is more to unpack there, but this is a journey. Let’s start with this for now.

I hope you enjoyed the first edition of the Bozeman Blitz. I’m looking forward to hearing your feedback, diving deeper into your questions, and your ideas and plans for making change in this city. I wrote this with the help of an amazing city commissioner, “say who,” and used my friend, Google, to fill in some gaps.


Till the next time when we’ll be tackling the affordable housing crisis.

All the best,

Greg

What the Helena 2023 Issue 17: Sine Die

Well, we’ve made it. After five long months, a slew of national news headlines, and nearly 800 bills passed, the 68th Montana Legislative Session is finally, blessedly over. So what comes next? 

First, we rest. Then, we continue– with municipal elections this fall, communities to build back up, and rulemaking processes that will determine how these 788 new laws are implemented, there’s a long road ahead of us. We hope you’ll join us.

For this week’s wrap-up edition of What the Helena, we decided to focus less on the nuts and bolts of policy change (although that’s in here, too) and more on our advocacy team’s experience watching the legislative session unfold. In a system that can feel so dehumanizing, it feels more important than ever to bring everything back to what ought to matter most: the people of Montana. So, here it is: sine die!


Queer & Trans Rights

I came into this session knowing very little about how the legislature works, and with, admittedly, very little faith in the legislature’s ability to enact much positive change for people in Montana.  I think I only vaguely knew that these people were actively making the laws, and I had this idea that bills proposed were written by experts.  I was baffled by the hilarious amount of ineptitude present in that building, as well as the amount of bills that seemed very clearly motivated by personal beefs and beliefs.  It was kind of shocking to continuously witness lawmakers demonstrate their willful ignorance, disregard for truth, and lack of interest in actually reading the bills that they sponsor. 

I came into this session fearing that it would make me jaded and bitter about organizing, that I would end the session feeling spent and confused.  There were certainly months where the transphobic rhetoric and unwillingness to recognize the humanity of trans people brought me to unprecedented levels of depression and despair, and I have become even more firm in my belief that the state will not, and cannot, liberate us. The system isn’t broken – it is a vice, a mechanism of control that is tightened by fear.  All six of the anti-trans & queer bills that we tracked diligently throughout this session have passed through both chambers, and SB 99, the bill banning gender-affirming care for minors, has been signed into law.  Lawmakers have ignored the pleas of the queer community and the testimony of medical experts in order to define intersex and transgender people out of law (SB 458), allow medical providers to discriminate on the basis of “ethics” (HB 303), allow students to bully their trans peers (HB 361), and characterize drag as inherently sexual and inappropriate for minors (HB 359).  We’re gonna take HB 234 as a win, because even though it did pass, the amended version has been defanged and can no longer be construed to automatically ban queer content from schools.  But still, the vice tightens on the queer and trans community. 

To me, the passage of these bills demonstrates the fear that these legislators hold, not just of trans people, but what we represent. What power do we hold that is so threatening to them?  The vice tightens but we are liquid, we shapeshift, we are expert escapologists – no matter how hard they try, they cannot crush us out of existence. We are creating worlds where colonial constructs, capitalist greed, white supremacy, and an angry god do not dictate law; we are creating worlds where the bases of their power are null – and that scares the SHIT out of the Regiers of this world.

It makes sense – I’m scared too. Sometimes the vice feels like a cradle, but it is still a vice, and my brown, trans body lusts for a new world. These last two weeks have made it clear that now is the time to transform.  Witnessing the trust, love, and sheer numbers of the queer and trans community has lifted me to a place I did not know existed. I have been revitalized by the sheer power of community, by the magic that trans and queer people hold, and I am ready to do what must be done. The portal has opened, this world is just starting her transition and we are ready to support her the whole way.  

Chloe Runs Behind (they/them), Issue Advocacy Organizer


Climate Justice

I have often said during this session that I came into it with a 5th grade level understanding of how the legislative process works; vaguely knew some of how bills become laws, knew that we elected folks to do something in relation to the bills, but that’s about it. When I learned Montana has a citizen legislature, I found some of my general political cynicism fading a bit; after all, if most of them are everyday Montanans, surely they’ll be better at listening to the rest of us, even with the ominous label of “supermajority” hanging over things, right?

Wrong, so very wrong. I will say, there were some amazing heroes along the way, trying their best to get legislation through that actually addressed the real concerns Montanans face: inflation in everything except wages, climate crises, housing insecurity, access to healthcare, supporting basic human rights, and more. 

However, the vast majority of legislators showed time and again that they were not listening, instead focusing on their own agendas and ignoring their constituents. So many folks showed up in opposition to the bills that attack climate justice and our rights to clean air and water, including HB 170, HB 971, SB 208, and SB 228. From repealing Montana’s energy policy and attacking a court decision that tries to make projects consider climate impacts, to banning the ability of local control over both limiting energy choices and the location of oil and petroleum plants, and more. 

This was so disheartening, to watch over and over again as they continually ignored both protocol and everyday Montanans in favor of big businesses or hateful out-of-state agendas. But y’all, we SHOWED UP ANYWAY – Working together with our neighbors towards the things that matter, as corny as that sounds, is what will make the difference towards creating change for our collective good.  In doing this work with everyday Montanans, y’all have taught me so much about community and how at the end of the day we need to take care of each other in the face of all this BS. We can do this together.

-Kat Elam, Billings Issue Advocacy Organizer


Democracy

It’s challenging to stay positive about the state of democracy in Montana after this year’s session, but for old time’s sake we should remember everything that happened over the last few months. At least in terms of legislation, things didn’t go that bad this session for democracy? The Governor signed SB 77, a really important bill that ends prison gerrymandering in Montana by counting inmates where their last address was rather than inflating the population of the towns they’re incarcerated. However, the heavily gerrymandered, Republican-tilted Public Service Commission map was also enacted when SB 109 was passed. SB 93is also a crummy limitation on the right of citizens to directly participate in democracy by passing ballot initiatives, as it requires a $3,700 fee to get one on the ballot and allows the Secretary of State or Attorney General to reject the initiative before it even makes its way before voters.

But, compare this to all of the anti-democracy bills that didn’t get passed! Bills that would restrict Montanans’ freedom to vote for whomever they want in primaries (SB 484, SB 565, and SB 566), make our judiciary partisan or outright eliminate court elections (HB 464, HB 595, HB 915, SB 302, SB 311, SB 372), eliminate other nonpartisan elections (SB 200, SB 317), or otherwise overcomplicate election procedures (SB 433, SB 435, SB 441).

While celebrating all of these huge pro-democracy victories is certainly in order, the flagrant violations of constitutional principles in the name of decorum is a disheartening attack on democracy. Montanans have the inalienable right to defend our lives and liberties, and our government is derived from the power of the people. Yet, the Republican supermajority has continually shown that they do not care that our state was so conceived and so dedicated. Expelling a duly elected member for utilizing an apparently insulting rhetorical device and depriving 11,000 Montanans from having a voice in Helena is blatantly discriminatory and should be offensive to anyone who cares about democracy. But it doesn’t stop there – Republicans have scheduled bills to prevent public participation in the legislative process (see the rushing of HB 971 through the Legislature with two weeks left in the session for proof of this), closed off the People’s House to the public, and clamped down on press freedom

In light of this, I’m left conflicted about how to feel going forward. On the one hand, I think putting my hopes in the two-party system to pull our state out of this tailspin is wishful thinking. Yet, we still have a great task remaining before us – to shape Montana into a place we want it to be. We showed up throughout the legislative session and made our voices heard, but I choose to remain cautiously optimistic that all this work and effort was not in vain. We did get some wins, after all! I truly believe that we all have the capability to contribute towards a brighter future for this state, and I hope you feel the same.

Zach Mangels (he/him), Legislative Fellow


Affordable Housing

Working on housing this session was a massive lesson in sitting with contradiction. Landlords passed bills to further tip the scales in their own favor (like HB 282 and HB 283), legislation to help bolster tenants’ rights (HB 785) and invest in affordable housing (HB 574) floundered, and Montana took huge strides forward in putting an end to racist, classist zoning policies that have bogged down our cities for decades (SB 323, SB 245, SB 382). All of this is true. 

As an effect of my excitement about zoning reforms that could have huge impacts on Montanans’ ability to live and thrive in this state, I often found myself testifying and lobbying in support of bills sponsored by Republican legislators who do not think that I, a trans person, should have the right to exist. 

One of the most exciting zoning bills of the session, SB 323, requires municipalities of more than 5,000 people to allow duplexes anywhere a single-family home can be built (extending to fourplexes in cities larger than 50,000 people). An extremely similar bill died last session when sponsored by Democrat Danny Tenenbaum, but sailed through with bipartisan support this session under Republican Senator Jeremy Trebas’s wing. Over the last several months (and increasingly toward the end of the session), Trebas has spent his free time bullying, misgendering, and harassing my friends and my legislator on the internet. 

It can be hard to focus on something like wonky zoning policy when the state is actively trying to eliminate people like you from society, but the session always asks us to do hard things. I feel excited about the zoning reform policies we were able to help usher through the legislature, and proud of the rooms I was able to get into. Montana has become a national leader on statewide zoning reform, and I’m hopeful that these new policies will help our cities meet the moment and take steps to resolve our state’s ongoing housing crisis. 

However, I also understand now more than ever that our current political system does not allow for us to approach this work in our full humanity. It asks us to choose between our personal truths and our political goals. It forces us to leave ourselves at the door, to equivocate, to cater to the norms and structures of white supremacy, capitalism, colonialism. But I also understand more than ever that as young people, as queer people, as trans people, my community has a unique ability to see the world for what it could be– to recognize that the future doesn’t have to look like the present. And this community has only gotten stronger, more powerful, and more connected over the last five months. I have a lot of hope for the future of Montana; I hope you’ll stick around for the ride. 

–Izzy Milch (they/them), Senior Advocacy Manager

What the Helena 2023 Issue #15

Well friends, we’re limping along and almost to the finish line of this very brutal legislative session! Through all the good news and bad, we’re grateful for you – your participation, questions, thoughts, ideas, and general existence bring us such joy. This week has been quite the doozy, but so many folks have shown up in so many ways, giving us those little heart-warming feels to help us keep going. Remember to take care of yourself, so we can continue taking care of each other ♥️ 


Calls to Action:
???? Veto Edition ???? 

We’ve officially reached the point in the legislative session where plenty of bills we’ve been watching have passed through the legislature and are now awaiting Governor Gianforte’s signature. You know what that means? A new phone number to call! Here are just a few of the no-good bills currently waiting to be signed into law. Ask the Governor to veto these bills by calling 406-444-3111 or filling out this form.

HB361

Sponsor: Brandon Ler

Summary: HB361 would make schools unable to discipline a student for misgendering or deadnaming another student. 

HB303

Sponsor: Amy Regier

Summary: HB 303 would allow any medical provider to deny care to any person for moral, religious, or conscience-related reasons.

HB 170

Sponsor: Steve Gunderson

Summary: HB 170 would completely repeal the state’s energy policy and goals, as well as the process for developing new goals.

SB 228

Sponsor: Jason Small

Summary: SB 228 would bar local governments from banning petroleum fuels.


“With Pride and Determination”

If you’ve been following the news this week, you already know that the Montana Freedom Caucus, Rep. Matt Regier, and essentially the entire Republican party have been doing everything they can to prevent Rep. Zooey Zephyr from speaking on the House floor. 

It all hit a boiling point after Rep. Zephyr closed her statement on SB 99, the gender affirming care ban, by saying “I hope the next time there’s an invocation, when you bow your heads in prayer, you see the blood on your hands.”

Now, Rep. Regier, who serves as the Speaker of the House, has indicated that he will not let Rep. Zephyr speak until she apologizes for speaking the truth about the impacts of these policies. She, in return, has indicated that she has no intention of doing so. You can read her statements in response to all of this on her Twitter. 

Let’s be clear: Rep. Zephyr is much more than the first trans woman in the Montana legislature, although that identity is certainly central to her censorship. She is also a fierce advocate for renters, a staunchly principled politician, and a thoughtful, kind person. She represents 11,000 Montanans whose voice in the House is now being denied to them. We won’t mince words: this is a fascist tactic to silence the voice of a duly elected representative, as well as the voters who sent her to Helena. 

Rep. Zephyr has made it clear that she will continue to advocate for trans Montanans and all of her constituents “with pride and determination.” We are behind her all the way. If you’re itching to give the people behind this censorship a piece of your mind, give Rep. Matt Regier, Speaker of the House, a call at 406-253-3293. 


Ch-ch-changes!

Even with just a couple weeks left in the session, there continue to be surprises around every corner. Remember HB 234, the bill that would ban “obscene” materials from schoolsand HB 359, the bill that would censor drag (and also just threaten the very existence of trans and GNC people)? Well, both of these bills have undergone some major makeovers in the Senate thanks to Sen. Dan Salomon and Sen. Chris Friedel, respectively.  

It seems like some folks have realized that criminalizing teachers for doing their jobs is actually a terrible idea, and the amended HB 234 removes schools, libraries, and museums from the section of criminal code that the original bill tried to twist against these institutions. Now the main purpose of this bill is to allow school districts to adopt ordinances, resolutions, or policies that are more restrictive than the definition of obscenity, which at least brings control back to local school districts. You can read the amended bill here!

HB 359, titled, “Prohibit minors from attending drag shows”, no longer contains the word “drag” in the text at all, and instead focuses on prohibiting minors from attending “adult-oriented shows” or entering “adult oriented businesses,” (things that minors are already not permitted to do) and defining what those two terms mean.  You can read this new version here!

Both of these amended bills have passed in the Senate, which means that they must now go back to the House to be voted on again. If one or both of these bills as amended are voted down in the House, it’ll go to a conference committee made up of House and Senate members. This committee will work to reconcile the differences between the bill that originally passed in the House and the amended bill that made it back to that chamber.  


Hero of the Week-

Sen. Ryan Lynch (D) Butte

Our hero, Sen. Ryan Lynch of Butte, has played a major role in securing some key pieces of legislation to reform our state’s criminal justice system! This week, the legislature debated Lynch’s SB 89, which creates a pretrial diversion pilot program as an alternative to unnecessarily incarcerating individuals with substance abuse disorders who have been charged with non-violent drug offenses. These interventions help to turn around mass incarceration by increasing the availability of treatment options, and are effective at reducing recidivism. 

Sen. Lynch also sponsored SB 166, which exempts barber services in correctional facilities from licensing requirements. Like Rep. Frazer’s dog training bill from last week, SB 166 recognizes the humanity of incarcerated people and is a step toward ensuring a better quality of life for Montanans in correctional facilities. Since the beginning of the session, when Sen. Lynch sponsored a (now-tabled) bill to decriminalize fentanyl testing strips, he has shown a staunch commitment to reducing harm and reforming inhumane systems. It can’t get much more heroic than that!


Villain of the Week-
Rep. Josh Kassmier (R) Fort Benton 

Our villain this week is Rep. Josh Kassmier of Fort Benton for sponsoring a frustrating and backwards bill under very shady circumstances.HB 971 undermines the protections of the Montana Environmental Policy Act (MEPA). It would allow state Department of Environmental Quality projects, which are required to get permitting through MEPA for air pollution, mining, and more, to forgo those rules entirely if the Montana Supreme Court requires them to consider projects’ climate change impacts on our Constitutional right to clean air and water.  Bizarre, right?!

This bill is clearly intended to benefit one monopoly corporation (*cough, cough* NorthWestern Energy *cough, cough*), and to circumvent one court ruling from this month that revoked NWE’s permit to construct a new gas plant in Laurel. 

Additionally, the process by which this bill was introduced and scheduled far past the deadline was deeply anti-democratic: suspending the rules, crunching the timeline, and giving very little notice for concerned constituents to come and state their opposition. Par for the course of this session, it’s clear that many of our representatives are prioritizing further reliance on fossil fuels that will come at great physical, financial, and environmental cost to Montanans, and like salting a wound, they are breaking all the rules to do it. 

Rep. Kassmier, none of this is what the people of Montana sent you here to do. However, despite the last-minute scheduling of the hearing, y’all stepped up to declare your opposition: in total, 572 opponents either signed up to testify or sent in public comment!  The bill did pass through the committee and is on track to coast through the House, so now it’s time to let your Senator know how you feel about your right to clean air and water: tell them to vote NO on HB 971!


Have you heard the latest episodes of our podcast? Listen here or wherever you get your podcasts.

What the Helena Issue #14

Has this year’s legislative session left you feeling discombobulated? Befuddled? Frazzled? Perhaps even perplexed? Well there’s a good reason for that – this year legislators have introduced the most bills since 1973, which is when Montana law had to undergo a massive overhaul to incorporate our brand-new Constitution! As we get into the closing few weeks of this session, please remember to take some time for yourselves. But for now, enjoy yet another edition of What the Helena!

Calls to Action

HB 889 would create protections for mobile home residents, including setting year-long (instead of month-to-month) leases as the default, mandating landlords to provide 60-day notice before they change or end a lease, and preventing landlords from retaliating against residents who speak up about park issues. Tell your Senator to vote YES on this step towards addressing Montana’s housing crisis.

SB 109 draws a highly partisan, gerrymandered map for the Public Service Commission’s districts. The PSC oversees Montana’s utilities, including NorthWestern Energy; it’s crucial that these districts are representative of Montana’s communities, not one political party. Tell your Representative to vote NO on SB 109.

SB 458 defines ‘sex’ in Montana law in a way that erases intersex people, prevents individuals from filling out & receiving legal documents in alignment with the gender they live as, collapses the umbrella of ‘sex-based discrimination’ to no longer include sexual or gender minorities or pregnant people as protected classes, and could cost taxpayers up to $7.5 billion to implement. Tell your Representative to vote NO on SB 458.


Housing: Good, Bad, Ugly

This week, a handful of zoning reform bills we’ve been excited to support were voted on in the House. First, a quick breakdown of each bill:

  • SB 245 legalizes multi-family and mixed-use developments in areas currently zoned for commercial, retail, or parking use, helping Montana move toward more dense and walkable cities.
  • SB 323 legalizes duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes in areas of cities with a population larger than 50,000 that are currently zoned for single-family construction only. 
  • SB 382 presents local governments with a menu of zoning reform options, requiring them to adopt the five that they believe will best help their towns increase the supply of attainable housing. 

All three of these reforms passed the House with incredible bipartisan support, and will now head to the Governor’s desk to be signed into law. As if that’s not enough good news…

SB 268, which would have significantly impeded local governments’ ability to regulate short-term rentals (like Airbnb) was resoundingly rejected by the House, with just 27 of the 100 Representatives voting in favor of the bill. This is an absolutely crucial step toward ensuring the new development options opened up by the suite of zoning reforms are used to house Montanans, not for wealthy developers and out-of-state investors to make a quick buck. 

While we’re on the topic of housing, we’d be remiss not to inform you that Rep. Zooey Zephyr’s HB 785 was tabled in the Senate Judiciary Committee. This bill would have required landlords to give tenants 60 days notice when terminating or changing their lease, and we’re beyond bummed to see it go down. Not only that, but the process was sneaky AF: the committee voted on the bill without notice or debate. You just might see this committee’s chair later on in this newsletter…


A debunked definition

Senate Bill 458 was heard for the last time in committee, to an uproar of opponent testimony, citing the immeasurable impacts that this bill would have on the intersex, transgender, non-binary, and Two-Spirit Montanans who this bill would define out of law.  Opponents cited factual, legal, and budgetary issues (SB 458 has estimated potential costs of 7.5 billion dollars – half of Montana’s budget!) with the bill while uplifting the strength and resilience of the trans community. Bill Sponsor Sen. Carl Glimm and the House Judiciary Committee were urged to consider whether the harmful impacts of SB 458 are worth inserting a biologically inaccurate definition of sex into the Montana Legal Code. 

Some members of the committee raised questions concerning some of the unsettling and harmful pieces of the bill, while others made unsuccessful attempts at “gotcha” questions (did you know that the existence of bisexuality is proof that there are only two sexes? Apparently Rep. Caleb Hinkle thinks so…) This is another bill that, regrettably, the sponsor appears not to be fully aware of the contents and repercussions of. Even after we heard from a great deal of varied and well-informed testimony, Senator Carl Glimm still wouldn’t admit that his bill would have any negative consequences. 

No matter how this bill turns out, opponents of SB 458 have done a very thorough job of debunking the definition that it aims to insert, and if the committee votes for this bill, they should be well aware that they are voting to codify biologically inaccurate language. We’ll keep you updated!


Cutting off CoreCivic

We are super relieved to let you know that Montana taxpayers will not be paying nearly $8 million over the next two years to send 120 incarcerated Montanans to a for-profit prison in Arizona. Wait… what??! Yup, an expanded contract with CoreCivic, a private prison giant, was added to the state budget mid-March, much to our dismay. 

However, this amendment has recently been removed from the budget, thanks to a counter-amendment from Sen. Ellie Boldman. Instead of paying $8 million for a temporary “quick fix” for overcrowding, lawmakers are instead working to increase bed space in-state, so those 120 people can remain in Montana, where their friends and family members are still able to visit them and help them re-enter society once they are released. Next step – fully ending Montana’s contract with this truly evil company.


Hero of the Week – Rep. Jonathan Karlen (D- Missoula)

You may have heard this rumor swirling around, that Montana might just be in the middle of what some would call a housing crisis. This week we want to congratulate our hero, Rep. Jonathan Karlen of Missoula, for introducing a bill that would create protections for some of the most vulnerable Montanans in the housing crisis: mobile home residents. HB 889 addresses a worrying trend we have seen in the past few years, where out-of-state investors purchase Montana’s mobile home parks and try to squeeze every penny out of their residents by raising rents, fees, and cutting maintenance. HB 889 does many things that would help alleviate this crisis, with some highlights including: 

  • Setting year-long, rather than month-to-month, leases as the default (unless both parties agree on different terms). 
  • Mandating landlords to provide a sixty-day notice before they change the terms of a lease.
  • Preventing landlords from targeting residents who speak up about the problems with the park by maliciously raising their rent or changing other park rules to punish them

While we agree with Rep. George Nikolakakos (R – Great Falls), who stated in the bill’s committee hearing last Wednesday that HB 889 “is just a first step” in creating all the protections Montana’s mobile home residents need, it is still a critical step to take. HB 889 has already passed the House and its Senate Committee with bipartisan support, so tell your Senator to vote YES on HB 889.


Villain of the Week – Sen. Keith Regier (R- Kalispell)

Our villain this week, Sen. Keith Regier of Kalispell, seems to be the walking definition of “doesn’t play well with others”. One of his bills, SB 109 (the one about drawing new PSC districts) was heard in the House Energy, Technology and Federal Relations committee on April 7th. To review, the PSC, or Public Service Commission, is a group of elected Montanans whose job it is to regulate the utility companies of Montana, like the monopoly that is NorthWestern Energy. Follow this link to learn more about the PSC!

During the hearing, there were 3 different amended maps proposed that nearly stuck to Regier’s espoused reasonings for his map: cities can benefit from being split, legislative district lines should be used to make these maps, and districts should be balanced in population distribution (his was actually the least balanced).  Rep. Derek Harvey of Butte, one of those who proposed a different map, mentioned in the hearing that Sen. Regier has not responded to anyone wanting to work with him on modifying his proposed (and very gerrymandered) redistricting map. 
Regier himself had no questions or comments during the hearing, and yet one by one, each amended map proposal was shot down. Gerrymandering and not cooperating with fellow legislators to best serve your constituents? That’s villainous behavior in our book! Ask your Representative to vote NO on SB 109 as it currently stands.

What the Helena 2023 Issue #13

???? Calls to Action ????

⚖️ SB 566 would create a brand new top-two primary procedure for next year’s US Senate election (and only that election), where only the two largest vote-getters in the June primary election move on to the November general election. This would almost certainly block any third-party candidate from appearing on the general election ballot, chipping away at the rights of both voters and candidates to participate meaningfully in our elections.  Tell your Representative and the House State Administration Committee to vote NO on this last-minute, undemocratic bill.

????️‍⚧️ HB 359 would ban “male or female impersonators” from any space where children might be present. HB 359 could have incredibly harmful impacts on the trans community, and relies on assumptions that trans and queer people are inherently predatory in order to censor and stigmatize an expansive, varied, culturally important art form.  What a drag… Tell your Senator to vote NO on HB 359.

???? HB 234 is a pro-censorship bill that would make book bans easier, and threaten teachers and school librarians with criminal penalties for doing their jobs. You can contact your Senator using this form to let them know that censorship through criminal penalties for teachers and librarians has no place in Montana.

???? HB 941 is an act to “establish a dog training and socialization program in the state prison or any other state-owned or contracted prison facility.” As Rep. Frazer mentioned, this is a “win-win-win” piece of legislation; in his closing, he said “We have a duty to try to do as much as we possibly can to help out our communities, which includes providing … [what] positive beneficial services we can at our correctional facilities.” HB 941, a lovely pup of tea, has passed to the Senate and will be heard on April 14 in the Senate Local Government Committee. Let your Senator and the Local Government Committee know that you dog-gone love HB 941!

???? SB 518 wouldstrip away students’ rights to privacy, education, and even medical care under the guise of securing “parental rights” in education.  We believe that young people’s rights are more important than their parents’ desire to control them, that queer kids deserve safe environments to explore their identities, and that our schools are equipped to govern themselves. If you agree, ask the House Judiciary Committee and your Representative to vote NO on SB 518.


Much Ado About Nothing? 

This week, the legislature passed a big deadline: Monday was the final day for Constitutional amendments, resolutions, and revenue bills to pass out of their first chamber. With this deadline came some surprises: it looks like, barring some unlikely but not impossible votes, almost every Constitutional amendment proposed this session might go down. This is huge news, especially since Constitutional changes were one of the biggest concerns for lots of folks heading into the session. It’s also reflective of what Montana voters want; according to a recent poll, just 15% of Montana voters support changing our Constitution.

Only one amendment, Sen. Ken Bogner’s proposal to provide for a mental health trust fund in the Montana Constitution, garnered more than enough bipartisan support in its first chamber to bolster its odds of making it across the finish line. Whether the proposal will gain support from voters in the 2024 election is anyone’s guess. 

As a reminder, in order to make it out of the legislature and onto the ballot, Constitutional amendments have to break 100 votes across the House and Senate. Every amendment still moving was sponsored by a Republican, whose party holds 68 seats in the House and 34 in the Senate, for a total of 102. That means that, in order for these proposals to pass out of the legislature, Republicans would have to hold a pretty tight party line. That didn’t happen this week: with the exception of SB 563, Bogner’s mental health trust fund, every proposed amendment received at least 3 party-breaking “no” votes. Here’s a quick breakdown of some of the proposed amendments and their votes:

HB 915would take away Montanans’ ability to vote in Supreme Court elections, instead giving the Governor power to appoint justices. Its final vote in the House this week was 59-39, meaning it faces a steep but not impossible road to get the support it would need to make it across the 100 vote threshold.

HB 517would chip away at the powers of the Board of Regents, the primary governing body for Montana’s universities. The Board of Regents exists to ensure that universities aren’t beholden to the political whims of the season, and this bill seems like a pretty clear response to their challenge of bills like HB 102 from the 2021 session that overstepped the legislature’s powers to regulate campus activity. This one passed the House with a 61-37 vote, meaning that to make it onto the ballot, it would need to get 39 votes in the Senate.

The Montana Constitution secures the right to bear arms, but specifies that it does not protect concealed carry. HB 551would change that, creating Constitutional protections for Montanans to carry concealed weapons.

In the midst of massive, youth-led demands for stricter gun laws, gun-loving Montana Representatives passed this measure on a 65-33 vote, making it the most likely to reach 100 votes across chambers. Still, for that to happen, Senate Republicans would have to vote as a unified block and pull over at least one Democratic Senator, so we’re hopeful this one will go down, too.

Remember, even if the legislature passes a Constitutional amendment, the people of Montana then have to approve that amendment before it becomes part of our Constitution.


Testing…

Our villain from two weeks ago, Sen. Greg Hertz, is still up to no good! He’s decided thatnow is the time to experiment with how Montanans vote– in one specific election, in one specific year. Sen. Hertz has introduced SB 566, which would create a brand new top two primary procedure for next year’s US Senate election, where only the two largest vote-getters in the June primary election move on to the November general election. 

This Republican-backed procedure is being introduced when, all too coincidentally, Montana’s only state-wide Democratic office holder is up for re-election! In another shocking coincidence, this primary system only applies to that person’s election! Not only that, but this bill is only in law for the election for 2024, and not any other Senate election in the future!

Supposedly, this is so the Legislature can “determine future applicability of the top two primary.” In practice, this would almost certainly block a Green Party, Libertarian, or Independent candidate from appearing on the general election ballot, chipping away at the rights of both voters and candidates to participate meaningfully in our elections. 

Rather than allowing Montanans to have the freedom to vote for whichever qualified Senate candidate they want, Sen. Hertz wants to rig the system and limit our right to choose whoever we want on the ballot. This bill passed the Senate last Tuesday, and will likely be heard in committee soon. Tell your Representative to vote NO on this last-minute, undemocratic bill.


Voting Victories

This week a bill sponsored by Sen. Shane Morigeau that would improve equal representation in Montana passed the Legislature! SB 77 would end prison gerrymandering in the state by counting incarcerated people towards the population of the community they last lived in when redistricting happens. This would be a big change to the system used prior to the 2020 redistricting, where prisoners were counted towards the population of where the prison is located. This has the effect of inflating the population of these locations with people who cannot participate in the political process. 

This change is important not only because it ensures more accurate representation in our electoral landscape, but also because census counts impact the funding a community receives over the next ten years. We know that people living in under-resourced communities are more likely to be criminalized, making this funding all the more crucial when attempting to right some of the systemic wrongs perpetuated by the prison industrial complex. The state’s redistricting commission used the process laid out in SB 77 to draw our newest legislative maps following the 2020 Census, and we’re thrilled to see this bill ensure that it continues into the future!

SB 77 is waiting to be signed into law by the Governor, so until then you can let him know that you support this great bill!


Sailing Away on the Censor-Ship

HB 359, the bill that would ban “male or female impersonators” from any space where children might be present was heard in committee on Tuesday, where it was met with a flood of dissent from Montanans protecting freedom of expression and the rights of trans people to exist in public spaces. The bill’s sponsor, Braxton Mitchell, when being questioned, had to continuously rely on misreading his own bill in order to avoid acknowledging the bill’s overly broad (and therefore unenforceable) nature.  

He also closed on his bill by suggesting that none of the opponents in the room had jobs. All ridiculousness aside, HB 359 could have incredibly harmful impacts on the trans community, and relies on assumptions that trans and queer people are inherently predatory in order to censor and stigmatize an expansive, varied, culturally important art form.  What a drag… Tell your Senator to vote NO on HB 359.

Another *obscene* attempt to censor queer art, HB 234, would make book bans easier by threat of criminal penalties against teachers and school librarians who are acting “in accordance with policies approved by the governing body of the institution.” Basically, public employees could go to jail for literally doing their jobs – all because a national panic has been stirred up about one specific book that no elementary or middle school library in Montana even owns, and that can’t even be banned based on the Constitutional requirement for obscenity

You can contact your Senator using this form to let them know that censorship through criminal penalties for teachers and librarians has no place in Montana.


Hero of the Week-  Rep. Gregory Frazer
HD 78 – (R) Deer Lodge

Woof, what a session! Our hero of the week is a real diamond in the ruff: Representative Gregory Frazer of Deer Lodge for his paw-sitively wonderful HB 941, an act to “Establish a dog training and socialization program in the state prison or any other state-owned or contracted prison facility.”  

We Shih-Tzu not, this bill generated so much barking; there was more debate on this bill than on any of the constitutional amendments that were voted on this week. Listening to this House session gave us big smiles as several folks pointed out the benefits for everyone involved: the folks in prison, the families whose dogs get the training, and the pups themselves of course! Also, this program is not new, even in Montana– the Montana Women’s Prison in Billings also has a successful Prison Paws program, which Rep. Jodee Etchart said during the floor session has “literally changed these womens’ lives.”

As Rep. Frazer mentioned, this is a “win-win-win” piece of legislation; in his closing, he said “We have a duty to try to do as much as we possibly can to help out our communities, which includes providing … [what] positive beneficial services we can at our correctional facilities.” We appreciate Rep. Frazer’s recognition that, surprise surprise, folks in prison are still people and are deserving of care and consideration.  

We thank Rep. Frazer for presenting this bill, paws-ibly our favorite of the whole session! HB 941, a lovely pup of tea, has passed to the Senate and will be heard on April 14 in the Senate Local Government Committee. Let your Senator and the Local Government Committee know that you dog-gone love HB 941!

Tired of legislators barking up the wrong tree? Time to hound them – check out our Calls to Action at the top of the newsletter, spread the word, and send messages when you can!


Villain of the Week- Sen. Theresa Manzella
SD 44 – (R) Hamilton

Our villain this week is Senator Theresa Manzella of Hamilton, who has been girlbossing (derogatory) and gaslighting her way through her fifth legislative session, and whose so-called “parental rights” bills, SB 518 and SB 337, we find particularly villainous. Manzella seems to be very committed to stripping away students’ rights to privacy, education, and even medical care, and isn’t worried about breaking a rule or two to get what she wants.  

At the beginning of the session, Sen. Manzella sponsored SB 337, a bill intended to grant parents an all-seeing eye into and vice-like grip over every educational activity, extracurricular, and physical and mental health care that their child participates in. SB 337 also specified that written consent from the parent would be required before a student could use a name other than their legal name or pronoun that does not “align with the child’s sex”, while also throwing in immunity for misgendering students that use different pronouns. Thankfully, this unhinged bill was voted down on the Senate floor at the beginning of March…. 

But Theresa didn’t stop there! Just 18 days later, she introduced SB 518, basically the same bill,  designed to accomplish the exact same purposes as SB 337 – which is very clearly prohibited in the Rules of the Montana Legislature (p. 25). 

For many students, school is the only place where they can get away from their overbearing, unsupportive, or even abusive parents. Sen. Manzella’s bill would create huge barriers for any child seeking someone safe to confide in at school, an environment where they can freely learn about topics their parents have sheltered them from, or a place to try out a new name or pronouns without being forced to come out to their parents and face the sadly, very common safety risks of coming out.  

Senator Manzella, children are people too!  We believe that young people’s rights are more important than their parents’ desire to control them, and we also think that the state has no place legislating familial trust issues. 

 We hope that SB 518, just like SB 337, dies, too, and you can send a message to the House Judiciary Committee letting them know how you feel about Manzella’s bill (and rule-breaking).

What the Helena 2023 Issue #12

Constitutional Changes & Another Zombie Bill

???? Calls to Action ????

⚖️ HB 915 proposes a Constitutional amendment that would replace our Supreme Court justice elections with a system where the Governor appoints new justices, needlessly injecting partisan politics into the courts. Tell your Representative you want to be able to elect your Supreme Court justice, and to vote NO on HB 915.

????️‍⚧️ HB 361 would perpetuate hostile school environments for transgender, non-binary, and Two-Spirit students by preventing any disciplinary action from being taken against students who refuse to use the correct name or pronouns for their classmates. Let’s stop this bill in the Senate – send a message to your Senator and urge them to vote NO on HB 361

⚕️ HB 303 would give anyone involved in providing health care services sweeping permissions to discriminate against patients, restricting access to medical services with little regard for the rights and needs of people seeking care.  Send a message to your Senator asking them to stand up for patients’ rights and vote NO on HB 303.

HB 625 is a zombified version of LR-131, a measure that Montana voters rejected just this November. Tell the Senate Judiciary committee to respect the will of those who elected them, and vote NO on HB 625.


A Breath of Fresh Air

Ready for some positivity? This week we testified in support of SB 532 from Sen. Mary Ann Dunwell of Helena, a bill to establish the Montana Climate Action Act! This bill would establish a carbon tax on any company that emits more than 25,000 metric tons or more of carbon and other greenhouse gasses each year. 

This bill shifts the physical price of pollution to those emitting it, incentivizing them to reduce those emissions, which then lessens harmful effects on folks in the forms of diseases like COPD, pneumonia, and so much more. It would also greatly benefit the beautiful habitats and incredible wildlife across this state that we are lucky to see and care for– and which tourists pay big bucks to visit.

Carbon taxes have been around across the US and the globe for over 15 years. It’s not a new concept, which means there’s a lot of research into the pros and cons. The tax implemented by SB 532 is low on the companies, starting at $10 per metric ton and increasing annually by $1 per metric ton, plus the rate of inflation, and they would receive help from the DEQ in planning the processes to reduce their carbon emissions!

This tax would also generate much revenue for the people who live and work and thrive in Montana. It is clear that this bill has had much thought put into it, and we’re grateful to Senator Dunwell for bringing it forward. Unfortunately, SB 532 was tabled in committee.


Constitutional Corner

We’re fast approaching the deadline for legislators to propose constitutional amendments, and they’re coming fast and furious. We’ve done our best to make some sense of this flurry of bills:

SB 272, introduced by Sen. Theresa Manzella of Hamilton, expands the powers of county sheriffs. This proposal has several major issues: it says that “historical powers of the sheriff may not be withdrawn, transferred from, or delegated to any person or entity outside the control of the sheriff.” This raises all kinds of complicated jurisdictional questions, especially for cases on tribal lands that could require involvement from tribal and federal law enforcement. 

These ideas are part of the constitutional sheriff movement, which you can read more about in this article from the Southern Poverty Law Center. This proposed amendment would give someone who just has to be “a qualified elector” with no prior legal training or experience the power to treat a county like their personal fiefdom, an idea that is incredibly dangerous for all Montanans. 

HB 895, introduced by Rep. Paul Green of Hardin, would alter our nonpartisan method of changing legislative district boundaries. This amendment changes the redistricting process by mandating the Legislature’s approval of the redistricting commission’s changes (without specifying what constitutes “approval”), rather than the current process where the Legislature gives the commission recommendations for changes that they can then consider and vote on.

This proposal would change the balance of redistricting in our state, in favor of prioritizing partisan pleas rather than creating districts that equally represent Montana. Redistricting must remain independent in Montana because when legislatures control redistricting they can use this power to serve their own political interests, rather than the interests of the people. Tell the House Judiciary Committee to vote NO on HB 895.

You thought we were done telling you about all the ways members of the Legislature want to change Montana’s judicial system? Think again! Rep. Bill Mercer of Billings has introduced HB 915, an amendment which would replace our Supreme Court justice elections with a system where the Governor appoints new justices. We’ve said it before and we’ll say it again, Montana’s nonpartisan judicial branch of government is essential for ensuring our state has a fair court system.

Proposals like these are not fixing a problem that really exists in our state; all they do is inject needless partisan politics into the courts. Tell your Representative you want to be able to elect your Supreme Court justice, and to vote NO on HB 915.

Updates

HB 361, Rep. Brandon Ler’s bill that would perpetuate hostile school environments for transgender, non-binary, and Two-Spirit students by preventing any disciplinary action from being taken against students who refuse to use the correct name or pronouns for their classmates, was heard in the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday.

The sponsor’s justification for this blatantly transphobic bill was (surprise!) blatant transphobia. Basically, he argued that students shouldn’t have to respect trans people’s names or pronouns because children have a right to deny the existence of trans people. 

Opponents included several trans students and parents of trans children who affirmed that trans people are very real, and that this bill would cause very real harm to students who already struggle to find acceptance and respect for their identities at school. One trans student questioned the sponsor’s intentions, asking, “What do you gain?… Are our lives really less important than passing this unnecessary bill?” 

What we really can’t wrap our heads around is how any of these legislators are still choosing to deny that people are actually trans! And that these real people with real identities (identities that have been around for thousands of years longer than this legislature has been around) deserve respect. 

Let’s stop this bill in the Senate – send a message to your Senator and urge them to vote NO on HB 361

HB 303, the so-called “Medical Ethics and Diversity Act” also had a Senate committee hearing on Monday.  Proponents of the bill specifically mentioned both abortion and gender affirming care as services that they don’t want to be forced to provide.  Once again, legal protections already exist for health professionals who choose not to participate in services that they morally object to.  HB 303 would give anyone involved in providing health care services sweeping permissions to discriminate against patients, restricting access to medical services with little regard for the rights and needs of people seeking care.   

Send a message to your Senator asking them to stand up for patients’ rights and vote NO on HB 303.

The hateful array of anti-trans bills moving through the Montana legislature includes HB 361, HB 303, and at least 4 others.  It has been truly heartbreaking to witness this in our state and across the country (currently, the ACLU is tracking 435 anti-LGBTQ bills). For Trans Day of Visibility on Friday, 3/31, we showed up at the Capitol to affirm our right to be trans, take our bodies back, and demonstrate the strength of solidarity amongst allies and members of the trans, non-binary, and Two-Spirit communities.  

We heard from some amazing speakers, including Indigenous trans youth, Keegan Medrano of the ACLU, Rep. Zooey Zephyr, and Hillary-Anne Crosby, before disrupting the capitol with our bodies and voices. For three minutes, we laid in the rotunda, in the middle of the halls where trans lives have been debated, defended, and ignored. 

Together, we must unite in defense of our lives, our bodies, and our autonomy. Through this action, we joyfully proclaimed that our bodies are our own and that our power, together, is stronger than any state.


VILLAIN OF THE WEEK –
Rep. Kerri Seekins-Crowe (R) Billings

Once again, some of our legislators are showing just how much they’re ignoring everyday Montanans. Our villain this week,  Rep. Kerri Seekins-Crowe of Billings, is trying to sneakily bring back LR-131 in the form of HB 625, which is deceivingly titled the “Infant Safety and Care Act.”

Y’all may remember that we just voted on LR-131, the so-called “Born-Alive Referendum,” last November, so why do we have so many legislators trying to bring back zombies?

For a quick refresher, you can check out these impactful stories from real Montana families about how LR-131 would have affected them. HB 625, this almost-identical zombified version, would require doctors, under threat of fees and jail time, to provide life-saving care to any infant “born alive…at any stage of development, who… breathes, has a beating heart, or has definite movement of voluntary muscles” even if the infant has no chance of survival due to complications. 

Reviving a policy that was just rejected by the Montana electorate? That’s villainous behavior. If you agree, tell the Senate Judiciary committee to vote NO on HB 625.


HERO OF THE WEEK –
Sen. Jen Gross (D) Billings

If you, like us, have watched what feels like one million hours of Senate Judiciary Committee hearings this session, then it’ll come as no surprise that Sen. Jen Gross of Billings is our hero this week. As the session barrels toward the bitter end, this committee has been hearing more than its fair share of highly controversial bills. As the Vice Chair of the committee, Sen. Gross has been a voice of reason through them all. 

During Tuesday’s hearing on HB 721, an inflammatory anti-abortion bill based on disinformation and stigmatization of crucial reproductive healthcare, tensions ran high. When it came time for the committee to ask questions, Senator Emrich started down a line of questioning comparing abortion procedures to satanic rituals. After Democratic Senators Gross and Olsen’s repeated objections were shut down by the Chair, Sen. Gross drew a line: she walked out of the hearing, and Senators Olsen and Webber followed. 

This isn’t the first time Sen. Gross has taken a stand against the disrespect and misinformation that so frequently rear their heads in her committee. From day one, she has spoken out against the rushed decision making, breaches of decorum, and inflammatory statements that have unfortunately become hallmarks of this legislative session. We know that this is extremely difficult work, and we’re grateful to Senator Gross for doing it. 

You can show your support for our Hero by asking your Senator to vote NO on HB 721. When you’re done, drop Sen. Gross a thank you note.

What the Helena 2023 Issue #11

Welcome to this week’s edition of What The Helena, where we’re tackling several housing bills, the state’s budget for the next two years, andmuch more!The $14.3 billion budget bill faced quite the all-day battle in the House this week, as amendment after amendment from the Democrats was voted down nearly along party lines. However, according to the House Appropriations Chair Llew Jones, R-Conrad: “[The budget] represents a good balance between the taxpayers’ pocketbook and the needs of critical services.” 

So, what were some of those rejected amendments? Adding more money to the state’s emergency rental assistance program; an effort to increase the amount of free K-12 school meals; and an attempt to restore cut funding for tribal colleges. The level of disconnect with actual problems that Montanans face is not a new concept here at WTH, but we sure wish they’d prove us wrong.  You can read more about this week’s budget debates in our Hero section as well as from the MT Free Press


???? Calls to Action ????

???? HB 361 will be heard in the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday. This bill would make it illegal for school employees or administrators to discipline students for choosing to disrespect another student’s chosen name or pronouns.  If you OPPOSE this pro-bullying  bill,let your Senator know and send them a message

⚕️ HB 303, which would allow medical providers to deny patients services on the basis of ethical, moral, or religious beliefs,will be heard in the Senate Public Health, Welfare and Safety Committee on Monday. Tell the Committee to vote NO on HB 303.

✎ SB 109 creates a gerrymandered map for the Public Service Commission that was drawn without public input, and garnered no proponents when it was heard in committee last Monday. Tell the House Energy, Technology, and Federal Relations Committee to OPPOSE SB 109 in its current form.

⚖️ SB 222 would essentially make it an unlawful, discriminatory practice to require state employees to participate in trainings on diversity, equity, and inclusion. If you think it’s important for state employees to gain the tools to understand and address prejudice and discrimination, let your Representative know that you OPPOSE SB 222


???? SB 268 would do two things: first, it would define short-term rentals, like Airbnbs, as a residential (not commercial) use of property. Second, it would severely restrict local governments’ abilities to regulate short-term rentals in their cities.The impacts of these short-term rentals hit the hardest on a local level, and local governments need to be able to regulate these rentals in ways that make sense for their communities. Ask the House Judiciary Committee and your Representative to vote NO on SB 268.


Update: Senate Bill 99 has passed

While following the path of this bill, it became very clear that supporters are not actually concerned about minors’ health, their concern is with minors’ identities. They don’t believe that young people and their families should be able to choose gender-affirming care, and they don’t believe that teachers should support trans students’ social transition, because something about a bunch of trans kids freaks them out….

And maybe they should be concerned! Maybe, young people with the critical thinking skills to question binaries and social constructs and the courage to live authentically are a very real threat to their worldviews – and their power.  These cowards in the legislature are unsettled by what they see as a “fad” because they don’t want to admit that REAL change and transformation is occurring. 

To the young people who will be affected by this bill, we recognize & validate your identity and want to affirm that while your body has been politicized, it is still YOURS.  Gender variance has been around wayyy longer than this state and this country have existed, and no state can EVER take away your inherent autonomy.  Your life and your existence are more powerful than any construct (including this government). 


Carving Up the PSC

If we could pick two heroes per week, we would certainly have chosen Rep. Katie Sullivan of Missoula for standing up to Sen. Keith Regier’s attempt to create a partisan gerrymandered map for the Public Service Commission’s districts. Sen. Regier’s map divides 6 of Montana’s largest cities and 14 counties to create sprawling, non-compact districts (something that, interestingly enough, Republicans took issue with when it came to the new legislative map). Take, for instance, the first district in Sen. Regier’s map, which grabs half of Great Falls and then stretches across eastern Montana like a backwards C to scoop in part of Billings as well.

When this bill was heard in committee last Monday, Sen. Regier claimed that this actually improves representation because it gives each of these cities two commissioners to hold accountable. In reality, this map is nothing more than a confusing jigsaw puzzle that divides the vote of Montanans living in Billings, Bozeman, Great Falls, Helena, Kalispell, and Missoula. There’s no good reason why, when the Commission only has 5 seats for the whole state, cities should be split between districts. It’s also worth noting that Regier’s new map didn’t have a single proponent at the hearing.

Thankfully, Rep. Sullivan has proposed to amend SB 109 to draw some common sense districts that would better represent Montanans.

  • The first of Rep. Sullivan’s maps retains the historical practice which draws PSC districts around county lines, which allows for cities to remain intact.
  • Rep. Sullivan’s second map draws the districts’ around state House districts, as Sen. Regier’s map does, but only splits one city (Missoula) and three counties. 
  • The final of Rep. Sullivan’s proposals also uses House districts, but doesn’t split any cities apart.

Redrawing the Public Service Commission’s districts is important, especially because the Legislature has chosen not to do it since 2003. Our current map was drawn by a court because the previous districts didn’t pass the constitutional standard of one person, one vote due to wildly unequal populations. But, the Legislature ought to draw the PSC’s lines fairly, and not to enact a partisan power grab.  

The House Energy, Technology, and Federal Relations Committee will consider Rep. Sullivan’s amendments when it votes on SB 109, so before then tell the Committee to vote NO on SB 109 in its current form, and to support one of Rep. Sullivan’s amendments.


Freedom to Ignore History

On Monday, Senate Bill 222 was heard in the House State Administration Committee, a bill that would essentially make it an unlawful, discriminatory practice to require state employees to participate in trainings on diversity, equity, and inclusion. The actual language of the bill is pretty strange, and as Dr. Angelina González-Aller of the Montana Human Rights Network powerfully stated in her testimony against the bill, this so-called “Montana Individual Freedom Act” uses factually incorrect characterizations of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion curriculum to grant people opposed to DEI trainings “the freedom to ignore history, the freedom to ignore the experiences of others, the freedom to repeat wrongs of the past, and the freedom to only serve a select subset of Montanans.”  

After testimony from one supporter and several opponents, including Meshayla Cox, the owner and founder of CoEquity Consulting, a fairly robust questioning of this very faulty bill took place. Committee members expressed concern for how trainings would be evaluated as to whether they “compel” people to believe or feel anything listed in the bill and whether law enforcement would still be required to learn how to appropriately respond to acts of white nationalism and neo-nazism. 

The committee also found that the bill’s sponsor, Senator Trebas, did not bring this bill forward due to any actual issues occurring in Montana or concerns voiced by his constituents, but took inspiration (and most of the language of this bill) from Florida’s “Stop W.O.K.E. Act” (which has been temporarily blocked in court due to its unconstitutionality). Sen. Trebas also admitted that he has never actually participated in a DEI training, and that “we’re jumping on the bandwagon with this one, I guess.”

Thankfully, Meshayla Cox did a fantastic job of grounding the conversation in the reality of DEI trainings, asserting that in no way are they intended to compel people to feel “guilt, anguish, or other forms of psychological distress,” and that workplace DEI trainings bring employees together through greater understanding of each other, including a recognition of our differences. Offering people language and space to have important conversations about historical and current realities is in no way discriminatory, and maybe supporters of this bill would agree if they’d learned the definition of “discrimination” in one of these trainings that they’re so opposed to.

If you think it’s important for state employees to gain the tools to understand and address prejudice and discrimination, let your Representative know that you OPPOSE SB 222


Hero of the Week- Rep. Mary Caferro

This week, we’re celebrating Rep. Mary Caferro of Helena for her comments in opposition to a provision in House Bill 2 (basically, the state budget) that would expand Montana’s contract with CoreCivic, the nation’s largest for-profit prison operator with an absolutely heinous track record, and transfer 150 people who are now incarcerated in Montana to a CoreCivic prison in Arizona.

At a press conference on Tuesday, Rep. Caferro expressed her frustration at the Republican party’s willingness to “turn their backs on everyday Montanans,” aptly noting that, “rather than just invest in solving the problems facing Montana workers and their families, Republicans chose a much different priority, writing checks for nearly $8 million for 150 Montana inmates to a private for-profit prison in Arizona, decreasing their chances of having successful reentry by losing connection with their families.”

Unlike the legislators and lobbyists pushing for this expanded contract, Rep. Caferro demonstrated that she’s thinking not only about the imprudence of this budgetary allocation, but also about the wellbeing of incarcerated Montanans and the long-term harm that this prison transfer would cause. We appreciate legislators who are grounded in the actual lives of people in Montana, and that’s why Rep. Mary Caferro is our Hero of the Week


Villain of the Week- Senator Greg Hertz  

SB 268,sponsored by Sen. Greg Hertz of Polson, would do two things: first, it would define short-term rentals, like Airbnbs, as a residential (not commercial) use of property. Second, it would severely restrict local governments’ abilities to regulate short-term rentals in their cities.The impacts of these short-term rentals hit the hardest on a local level, and local governments need to be able to regulate these rentals in ways that make sense for their communities. SB 268 would take away that ability.

ICYMI, Montana is in a housing crisis. The people who live and work in our communities are being driven out by rising housing costs and crunched long-term rental supply– two things that studies have shown short-term rentals only worsen. This problem is especially prevalent in Montana’s resort and gateway communities like Whitefish and Big Sky, where ongoing efforts to regulate short-term rentals could be severely impeded by the passage of this bill. 

This session, we’ve been excited to support a number of measures intended to increase Montana’s housing supply; measures that would allow the development of ADUs, mixed-use neighborhoods, and multi-family housing in communities across Montana. If passed, SB 268 could allow those newly-legalized projects to house short-term visitors and line the pockets of wealthy investors, rather than become home to the many Montanans hoping to put down roots in our state.

If Senator Hertz is serious about addressing Montana’s housing crisis, this is a massive step in the wrong direction. Let your Representative know that you support local governments’ abilities to regulate short-term rentals, and ask them to vote NO on SB 268.

What the Helena 2023 Issue #10

Welcome back, dear readers, to the second half of this whirlwind of a legislative session. We’re officially past the halfway point and back from transmittal break! That means that no more general bills– bills that aren’t related to revenue or Constitutional changes– can be introduced. Now, bills that have already passed in one chamber (the House or the Senate) will move to the other, where there will be one more opportunity for public hearings, so get those testimony muscles warmed up!

This week has brought a handful of eyebrow-raising proposals to change our Constitution (a Constitution that Montanans overwhelmingly want to preserve), and a few of the hottest-button bills from the first half of the session are already scheduled for their second hearings. We’re off to the races! 

If you’re looking for an opportunity to make your voice heard in community, look no further! Forward Montana is hosting weekly Monday night “Write for our Rights” gatherings, where we discuss the bills moving that week and take action together. RSVP here for the Zoom link, and we’ll see you there!


???? Calls to Action ????

????️‍⚧️ SB 99, which would prohibit gender-affirming medical care for minors and prevent public employees from supporting a minor’s social transition, will be heard in the House Judiciary Committee on Monday.  Contact the committee and your Representative and urge them to vote NO on this harmful and overreaching bill. 

???? HB 282 strengthens landlords’ powers over tenants to terminate rental agreements and extract an additional three months’ rent from renters in court if the renters are not out by the lease termination date.  Urge your Senator to protect renters, not landlords, during this dire housing crisis, and vote NO on HB 282.

???? HB 517
seeks to restrict the Board of Regents’ Constitutional authority to oversee Montana’s university system– an authority that exists to protect students from political overreach into their education. Ask the House Judiciary Committee to vote NO on HB 517.

⚖️ HB 405 would allow for tiny portions of a county’s population to call for a citizens’ grand jury to investigate any supposed crime– a favorite tool of right-wing militia groups that has been used to attempt to indict anyone from Barack Obama to the Montana Human Rights Network. Ask the House Judiciary Committee to vote NO on HB 405.

✍️ SB 109 draws a highly partisan, gerrymandered map for the Public Service Commission’s districts. The PSC oversees Montana’s utilities, including NorthWestern Energy; it’s crucial that these districts are representative of Montana’s communities, not one political party. Ask the House Energy, Technology and Federal Relations Committee to vote NO on SB 109.

♀️♂️ SB 458 defines ‘sex’ in Montana law in a way that erases intersex people, prevents individuals from filling out & receiving legal documents in alignment with the gender they live as, and collapses the umbrella of ‘sex-based discrimination’ to no longer include sexual or gender minorities or pregnant people as protected classes. Yikes.  Ask your Representative to vote NO on SB 458.


So not ‘sex’y

SB 458 made it to the Senate floor on Wednesday, where it was debated amongst the body before being passed 28 to 22.  While the sponsor of this bill, Sen. Carl Glimm, would like for you to believe that the 60 page bill only adds “three simple definitions” (for ‘sex’, ‘male’, and ‘female’) to the Montana legal code, and has nothing to do with “transgenderism” or discrimination (even though the word “discrimination” appears in the bill 15 times), this minimizing rhetoric couldn’t be further from the truth, as many opponents on the Senate floor argued. 

For one, forcing individuals to identify as either male or female based on their gametes is a violation of privacy, and opponents also argued that it challenges federally recognized protected classes that fall under the umbrella of “sex-based discrimination” – pregnancy status and sexual and gender identity –  in a way that would threaten federal funding to the state of Montana. Erasing these protections for pregnant and LGBTQIA2S+ individuals from anti-discrimination law is a HUGE deal, and much more complex and harmful than simply “defining sex.” 

At this reading, Senator Molnar introduced an amendment to the bill that he hoped would provide “equal protection under the law” for intersex individuals (the existence of whom he learned about a mere three weeks ago). While this amendment seems to have been in good faith, we were once again reminded that good intentions cannot make up for actual medical knowledge, and the amendment only inserts more confusing and inaccurate language into the bill, arbitrarily deciding for medical professionals how they should classify an intersex infant’s sex.

Please urge your Representative to vote NO on SB 458. It barely made it out of the Senate, and we have hope that it can be stopped by more reasonable and responsible legislators in the House. 


If It’s Not Broken, Don’t “Fix” It

HB 517, sponsored by Rep. Mike Hopkins of Missoula, is a proposed amendment to the state Constitution that claims it would enable the Legislature to ensure college students’ constitutional rights and liberties are not being violated. However, this bill seems to be a direct response to one court case. Last year, the Montana Supreme Court unanimously ruled that HB 102, which would have allowed open or concealed firearms to be carried on any campus in the state, is unconstitutional. Specifically, this act violated the constitutional authority of the Montana Board of Regents to create policies for the University System. 

Our state’s Constitution gives the Board of Regents this latitude in the first place because before 1972, the Legislature had direct control over higher education. This meant legislators with an ax to grind would target professors and programs for teaching subjects they didn’t like by attempting to fire faculty or change curriculum, which severely curtailed academic freedom. Our Board of Regents was created to insulate higher education from the Legislature’s partisanship in order to ensure Montana’s college students receive a quality education, and HB 517 will not help this.

Tell the House Judiciary Committee and your Representative to vote no on HB 517. If you’re a student and feel your rights are being violated, you can contact the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights.

HB 405 is another proposed constitutional amendment, sponsored by Rep. Lola Sheldon-Galloway of Great Falls. This proposal would allow half-a-percent of registered voters in a county to sign a petition to call a grand jury to investigate an alleged crime. This bill would allow a tiny number of people (anywhere from 2 in Petroleum County to 530 in Yellowstone) to hijack the judicial system and investigate any supposed crime they wish. Under this bill, any indictment brought by the grand jury would have to be prosecuted by the county attorney– a massive waste of state time and money, as these cases are almost always meritless and lacking evidence.

Not only is this proposal unworkable, but these types of grand juries are the brainchild of right-wing militia groups. When citizen’s grand juries are assembled, they have historically been used as political tools against supposed radical left enemies of America. Several of these grand juries have convened across the country in recent years and have tried to dispense with their brand of justice by indicting anyone ranging from President Obama to the Montana Human Rights Network.

In February, the House Judiciary Committee voted to table another citizen’s grand jury bill, HB 589. Tell the Committee to table HB 405 as well.


Gerrymander? I hardly know her!

Ready for another sneaky bill? This one is a real doozy, as it was entered with some actually good qualities, and then changed near the last minute to be AWFUL (shocking, right?).  SB 109, presented by Sen. Keith Regier of Kalispell is all about redrawing the PSC districts of Montana. 

Before we get into why this became problematic, what the Helena is the PSC? The PSC, or Public Service Commission, is a group of elected Montanans whose job it is to regulate the utility companies of Montana, like the monopoly that is NorthWestern Energy. Follow this link to learn more about the PSC!

In 2021, though, the courts had to step in for a few reasons: changes to the PSC’s district lines had not been made in 18 years (!!!), there were huge and uneven population booms in some of the districts, and the legislature was not in session. The court drew new districts and left it to the legislature to approve. 

SB 109’s initial goal was to both approve the court’s map and lay out a process for legislature to adjust the PSC’s districts following each decennial census. However, like most sneaky things this legislative session, one night just a few days before transmittal, Regier submitted an amendment to SB 109 that REEKS of gerrymandering. It creates its own new map for the PSC districts. This map splits several counties and towns in ways that make no sense, unless you’re trying to favor a certain political party.

Now, why does this matter? The PSC makes decisions that impact our present and future in regards to energy use and costs, the potential for renewables, and more! These decisions should be made in the best interests of the citizens and communities of Montana. The way the courts drew the map didn’t seem too partisan, but Regier’s new map has been drawn

not following county lines and looking rather like a jigsaw-puzzle, in ways that may encourage more partisan-led thinking. It’s sad that wanting a clean environment is often seen as a partisan issue, but this is our reality right now – so let’s remind our legislators that we all deserve a clean and healthful future!

SB 109 is being heard in the House’s Energy, Technology and Federal Relations Committee on Monday March 20th. Tell the committee to vote NO on SB 109


Hero of the Week- Rep. Kim Abbott

While there are plenty of bills still in motion that seem to be solutions in search of a problem, some legislators are spending their time trying to fix some of the most broken parts of Montana’s landscape. For her sponsorship of HB 574, a bill to establish a workforce housing trust fund, we are thrilled to recognize Minority Leader Kim Abbott of Helena as our hero this week. This bill designates $500 million from Montana’s general fund to be used for grants and loans for the development and preservation of affordable housing– something that is a dire need in Montana

As Rep. Abbott pointed out during the bill’s hearing on Monday, there have been plenty of proposals so far this session that aim to address our state’s housing crisis. Many of these bills have been focused on zoning and regulatory reform, but haven’t included requirements or incentives that these newly-legalized building projects are affordable. We agree with Rep. Abbott that it’s time to come at this issue from all angles, and HB 574 is an exciting step toward a Montana where the people who make our communities what they are can afford to live. 

We appreciate Rep. Abbott’s commitment to solving the real problems facing Montanans. You can show your support by asking your Senator to vote YES on HB 574!


Villain of the Week- Rep. Steven Galloway  

Our villain this week has made his priority clear this session: giving landlords more power (we’ll give you one guess as to this villain’s occupation…). Rep. Steven Galloway of Great Falls is the sponsor of both HB 282 and HB 283, both of which would further tip the scales in favor of landlords in Montana. 

HB 283, which was heard in committee on Wednesday, would restrict local governments from imposing any restrictions or regulations on landlords that aren’t explicitly outlined in the Montana Landlord-Tenant Act– even if those regulations apply to all other businesses and residences in the city. Montana’s local governments already have very little power when it comes to the regulation of landlord activities, but this small change seems to essentially create a special legal class only for landlords, which, if you ask us, is absolutely bonkers. 

Galloway’s second landlord bill, HB 282, has been heavily amended since it was first heard in the House, but it’s still bad news. Under the current version of HB 282, if a tenant either changes their locks without permission or doesn’t grant their landlord access to their home, the landlord can issue a 24-hour notice to correct this violation; if it’s not corrected within 24 hours, the landlord can issue a 3-day notice for termination of the lease. Now, under the Montana Landlord-Tenant Act, refusal of access is already grounds for lease termination, but this timeline is Galloway’s contribution. 

Imagine this: You change your locks as an emergency safety measure, and decide to leave town for a few days to stay with a friend. In that time, your landlord decides they’d like to inspect your home, but they can’t get in. 24 hours later, you have three days to find a new place to live– a near-impossible ask in today’s rental climate.

Rep. Galloway, who has been a landlord for forty-seven years, seems to have forgotten that he was elected to serve all of his constituents. Legislating in your own self-interest? That’s villainous behavior.

HB 282 is being heard in the Senate Local Government Committee on Monday, March 20. Tell the committee to protect tenants, and vote NO on HB 282.

What the Helena 2023- Issue #9

Well, readers, we are officially halfway through this absolute whirlwind of a legislative session. The Capitol building is the quietest it’s been in months, and after a series of marathon days and rapid-fire bill debates, our legislators are taking some hard-earned time off over this transmittal break to rest, recuperate, and then do it all again.

So, WTH is transmittal? Great question! Transmittal is the midway point of the legislative session. It’s also the deadline for all general (non-budget-related) bills to be passed out of the chamber where they originated, or else they’re outta luck. That’s why, over the last week, both the House and the Senate frantically debated and voted on hundreds of bills, many of which could have gigantic impacts on the way life looks in Montana. 

Bills that passed out of one chamber this week will now move to the other chamber  (chambers = the House and the Senate), where they’ll be scheduled for another hearing prior to moving to the floor for a full vote. This means that the public will have another opportunity to testify, so if there was a bill you missed that you want to speak to, start working on that testimony now!

If bills pass in the second chamber, they’ll be sent to Governor Gianforte’s desk. If they’re signed there, we anticipate that many of them will end up in court.

You can still send web messages to your legislators about any bill, no matter where it is in the process. For now, though, rest up, thank yourself for being engaged in the first half of the session, and do what you need to do to come back in full force next week. We appreciate you!

Queer and Trans Rights

Once again, scads of legislators are proving to us that their personal agendas and misinformed fears of trans community are more important to them than the tens of thousands of LGBTQIA2S+ people living in Montana. These legislators are not being accountable to the people they were elected to serve, nor are they respecting our rights delineated in the state and federal Constitutions. 

We must hold each other close during this time, and prioritize the wellbeing of our communities while we face attacks at the state level.  We are incredibly grateful and honored to organize alongside so many LGBTQ+ Montanans and allies working to stay in control of the narrative, prove that these harmful bills are NOT for Montana, and most of all, show young people that there are so many folks out here who accept them and care about their future in this state. 

Here are the bills that we’ll be keeping an eye on after the transmittal break. Stay tuned for updates on how you can take action! 

SB 99, the misleadingly titled “Youth Health Protection Act,” would ban minors from receiving any sort of gender-affirming care – from puberty blockers & hormones to affirmation of a new name or pronouns at school. 

SB 458 would insert an incorrect and harmful definition of sex into the Montana legal code, preventing intersex, trans, non-binary, and Two-Spirit people from having accurate documents from birth to death, and effectively removing sexual orientation and gender identity from the list of protected classes. 

HB 361 would make it illegal to discipline students for deadnaming and misgendering their peers.

HB 359 would ban drag performances in any public space, with a definition of drag that could criminalize any trans person in public.

HB 303, the so-called “Medical Ethics and Diversity Act” would allow any medical provider to withhold services based on ethical, moral, or religious beliefs. 

HB 234 would ban any materials considered to be “obscene” (read: queer, brown, black) from public schools, placing public school employees at risk of criminal penalties for sharing information.

We know that all of this can be taxing on the mental health of trans and queer folks who are witnessing the events and conversations unfolding right now, both in Montana and across the country. We encourage our cis readers to show some extra love to the people in your lives who are feeling the force of these bills. For our trans, nonbinary, and two spirit readers: step back when you need to, protect your peace, and hold yourself and those around you close. If you need support beyond what your community can provide, here are a few places to start: 

  • Trans Lifeline – (877) 565-8860 – 24/7 hotline to talk with a trans peer – divested from police.
  • LGBT National Hotline – (888) 843-4564 – trained LGBTQIA+ peer volunteers – will never report your calls to any outside organization or authority. 
  • TrevorLifeline – (866) 488-7386 – 24/7 hotline for LGBTQ+ folks to talk with a trained counselor
  • TrevorChat – thetrevorproject.org – 24/7 online instant messaging to talk to a counselor
  • TrevorText – text START to 678-678 – 24/7 text-based support line for LGBTQ+ folks

Affordable Housing and Tenants Rights

We’ve seen several recommendations from Governor Gianforte’s Housing Task Force appear in bills that have both passed and died during the first half of the legislative session. Most of these recommendations are backed by bipartisan support and center around state-level zoning reforms, like legalizing accessory dwelling units and multi-unit developments in Montana neighborhoods. While we’ve been happy to support a handful of  statewide reforms we think could really move the needle on our state’s housing crisis, there are a few, like a bill banning local governments from regulating Air BnBs, that we’re concerned about.

We’ve also seen a handful of bills that aim to adjust the scales between landlord and tenant power, for better or for worse. In a legislature where there are significantly more landlords than there are people indigenous to this land, these bills all get at a deeper question: Who gets to live in Montana, and who gets to decide? 

Here are the affordable housing and tenants rights bills we’re watching that are still making their way through the legislative process:

SB 268 would prevent local governments from restricting short-term rentals.

HB 282 would allow landlords to post a “deficiency notice” notifying a tenant of a lease violation; if not addressed & remedied within 3 days (amended from 24 hours), the landlord can terminate the lease. 

HB 785 requires landlords to give 60 days notice to tenants whose lease is being changed or terminated.

SB 245 would revise municipal zoning to allow multi-family and mixed-use developments in areas currently zoned for parking, office, and retail uses.

SB 323 would legalize duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes anywhere a single family home is allowed.

HB 546 would allocate funding from Montana’s Coal Trust toward loans for the development and preservation of affordable multi-family homes.

SB 382 would make a handful of changes to Montana’s zoning policy that would push local governments and developers toward creating denser, more walkable, more liveable neighborhoods where more Montanans can afford to live.

SB 320 would require landlords to refund unused portions of rental application fees to applicants who aren’t granted the rental.


Climate Justice

“The ice we skate is getting pretty thin…
My world’s on fire, how bout yours?”

Well friends, things in the climate justice arena are going about as well as you’d expect in the legislature – the bad bills are advancing and of the few good bills, many have been tabled. But it’s not all bad news – the good news is that many local governments and activists in places like 

Bozeman, Missoula, and Billings, are continuing to push for change, bringing awareness to their communities and legislators alike! Grassroots organizing and bottom-up approaches have the power to make changes that truly reflect what our communities want, so let’s keep learning, spreading the word, and pressuring our legislators!

Only two of the main bills we’ve been following have made it past committee, and unfortunately they’re not good:

HB 170 would repeal both the state’s energy policy and the mechanism to make those policies, with nothing to replace them. As a reminder, policies like these are what guide the making of new laws!

SB 228 would ban not only local governments, but the people who live in and understand our communities, from having an active say in the construction, placement, or impacts of petroleum or methane plants, pipelines, and other facilities 

You can find a whole bunch of others being followed by our friends at the Montana Environmental Information Center


Democracy & Judicial Independence

At least there’s one (relative) silver-lining from this tire fire of a session. Many of the bills that would harm Montana’s democracy have been tabled. Let’s take a moment to celebrate some of the wins that we’ve achieved to protect democratic government in this state, starting with reminders about some bills we’ve already talked about:

SB 200, HB 464, SB 302, and HB 595 all would have done away with nonpartisan elections in some way or another, whether it be all nonpartisan races or just judicial ones. Thankfully, these bills were either tabled in committee or failed their floor vote.

SB 372, which would have eliminated state Supreme Court elections entirely, was tabled in committee

SB 441, which would have revived the Ballot Interference Protection Act (which has already been found to be unconstitutional multiple times) had its committee hearing canceled, effectively killing the bill.

Tons of bad democracy bills have died this session, including many during transmittal (such as bills to make city elections partisan, unnecessarily involve the Attorney General in inspecting voting machines, and to require Montanans to register to vote with their party affiliation) that we just don’t have the space to cover in-depth! 

But it just wouldn’t be a session of the Montana Legislature without attempts to limit our right to participate in democracy. Going into the second half of the session, here are some anti-democracy bills to keep an eye out for:

HB 598 would prohibit the use of ranked-choice voting in Montana, a method which isn’t used anywhere in Montana but should still be an option for municipalities to implement if they choose.

HB 712 is an entirely pointless bill because it is already illegal for non-citizens to vote, and does nothing other than enter prejudiced language against immigrants into our state’s law.

HB 733 allows successful election candidates to contribute any leftover money from their campaign to a new election fund, creating a huge disadvantage for challengers and allowing for more money to enter our politics.

HB 774 and SB 420 would both change the dates of Montana’s elections. Currently, Montana has its elections for federal and state-wide offices on even years and local elections on odd years. These bills would place elections on even years or all city elections on even years respectively, which would make ballots longer and contribute to the problem of voters deciding not to vote in certain elections. 

SB 93 establishes a $3,700 barrier to entry for citizens who want to put a ballot initiative to the voters.


Hero of the Week- Rep. Zooey Zephyr

This week, we are thrilled to recognize Rep. Zooey Zephyr of Missoula for a bill she’s sponsoring that would help Montanans stay in the communities we love. HB 785 would make a small change to Montana’s Landlord-Tenant Act: it would require landlords to give 60 days notice (extended from the current 30 day requirement) when a lease is being changed– like a rent increase– or terminated. 

If you’ve had to look for new housing lately, you know that 30 days is often not enough time to find, apply for, secure, and gather the money to pay a deposit on a new apartment. This bill could be the difference between people being able to stay in our communities and being forced out or becoming unhoused. As the Representative for a district that’s around 50% renters and one of the few renters in the legislature, we applaud Rep. Zephyr’s commitment to pushing for policies that would make a real difference in the lives of the folks who sent her to Helena. 

“All we’re asking is that tenants have enough time to make decisions that are right for them and not be forced out of the communities that they want to put down roots in.” – Rep. Zooey Zephyr

Rep. Zephyr has already generated plenty of buzz this session for her history-making role in the legislature and her impassioned defense of Montana’s queer and trans communities. We cannot thank her enough for that extremely difficult work, and will continue to fight for a Montana that allows representatives of all identities to focus on their own excellent policy proposals rather than being forced to repeatedly defend their right to exist in this state. Rep. Zephyr, Montana is lucky to have you!


Villain of the Week- Sen. Carl Glimm 

Our villain for this week is Senator Carl Glimm, the sponsor of SB 458, another bill with wide-reaching and harmful effects on intersex, transgender, non-binary, and Two-Spirit people.  This 61-page bill has both unclear intentions and unclear impacts; at the committee hearing on Monday, even Glimm seemed confused about how to defend his own bill.

So, what would SB 458 do? Its stated purpose is to “define sex in Montana law” – but it would do a whole lot more than codify a scientifically incorrect definition of sex. The bulk of this bill inserts this new definition into sections of the law to:

  • Enforce the use of one’s “biological sex” in documents ranging from birth certificates to marriage licenses to burial records, forcing transgender people to disclose private information and deny the sex that they live as.  How any intersex or gender-diverse person is expected to navigate these processes is unclear. 
  • Redefine the meaning of “sex based discrimination” in all instances where it is illegal. At a federal level, sex based discrimination includes gender and sexual orientation based discrimination – this bill would remove gender and sexual orientation from the list of protected classes.

After hearing more than 40 people testify against this bill (and only 6 people in support), Sen. Pat Flowers aptly asked Glimm, “Given what we’ve heard about all the impacts this is going to have on human beings, why is this so important?…If this is a solution, what would be the problem?”

All Glimm could do in response was to stammer out the same Heritage Foundation talking point he’d been repeating all night… that sex and gender used to mean the same thing, and now they don’t. 

Glimm’s confusion about gender and sex seems more like a personal problem than something that should be settled at a state level.  It also seems like his prejudices have allowed him to be puppetted in service of a national anti-trans agenda. Not cool, Carl Glimm!


Take time to rest and recharge, because these issues are hard to follow and often personal, it’s so important to take care of yourself. We will be back next week ready to take on more of this wild ride. ????

What the Helena 2023- Issue #8

Calls to Action

????????‍⚖️ SB 302 would make the November election for judges partisan after a nonpartisan primary election. Contact your legislators and tell them to vote NO on SB 302.

???? SB 441 prohibits anyone but a family member from returning a voter’s ballot (with exceptions for election and postal workers), in a clear attempt to further disenfranchise Native and disabled voters who rely on their communities to help them cast a ballot. Send the Senate State Administration Committee a message asking them to vote NO on SB 441.

If you have had someone else turn in your ballot for you OR if you have turned in a ballot for someone else, we want to hear from you! Just respond to this email.

????️‍???? SB 458 defines sex in Montana law in a way that erases intersex people and makes it easier to discriminate against intersex, trans, nonbinary, and Two Spirit people. SB 458 is scheduled for a hearing on Monday, February 27. Send a message to the Senate Public Health, Welfare, and Safety Committee letting them know that you OPPOSE SB 458 or sign up to give virtual testimony by 10PM tonight. Want to testify in person and need a ride or offer a ride? Sign up to carpool to the hearing on Monday using this form.

⚕️ HB 544 would severely limit Medicaid coverage of abortion and require people seeking abortions to provide incredibly personal information in order to prove that the procedure is “medically necessary.” Send a message to your Representative urging them to vote NO on this harmful, unlawful, and unconstitutional bill. 


What’s New

We are rapidly barreling toward the legislature’s transmittal deadline, and the bills are flying. Next week, we’ll hit the midway point of the session, and with it come some important dates: Friday, February 24, was the last day for the introduction of general bills, and all non-revenue-related bills that haven’t passed from one chamber to the other by Friday, March 3 will automatically die. This means that, after next week, we’ll have a good idea of what to expect from the rest of the session.

It also means that, in the next few days, committees will fly through hundreds of bill hearings,  before the transmittal deadline. Many of these hearings will be rushed, starting early in the morning and extending far past their scheduled times, with limited time for public comment.  Even though we’re frustrated by the inaccessibility built into this system, we want to make sure your voice is heard – read on to learn how you can get involved at this crucial time, and keep an eye on our social media for updates and calls to action!


Whatever happened to checks and balances?

The importance of an independent judiciary in our political system has been recognized since the beginning of the American political system. Alexander Hamilton noted, when arguing in favor of the ratification of the US Constitution, that an independent court system is necessary in ensuring that “all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the Constitution [are declared] void.” Montana’s own judicial system ensures this by providing a fair, independent, and nonpartisan check on the powers of the other branches of government.

Throughout this session, we have had “reason to fear that the pestilential breath of [partisanship] may poison the fountains of justice” in Montana. There has been an onslaught of bills that would, in some form or another, make our state’s court system partisan and stop judges from being independent arbiters of the law. Below is a summary (that’s as brief as it can be) of some of the bills that have tried to attack our nonpartisan judicial system. 

For starters, here are the bills lawmakers have had the good sense to defeat: 

HB 595, sponsored by Rep. Scot Kerns of Great Falls, would mandate that judge candidates undergo the same partisan nomination and election process as all other political candidates, as well as allow for parties to endorse certain candidates. This bill was heard by the House Judiciary Committee last Tuesday but was thankfully tabled!

SB 372, another tabled bill, was proposed by Sen. Daniel Emrich also of Great Falls. It would have stripped Montanans of their constitutional right to vote for their Supreme Court justices. Instead, this bill would have put forward a Constitutional amendment requiring justices to be chosen by the House of Representatives and confirmed by the Senate.

SB 311, by Sen. Barry Usher of Billings, is a bill so nice it failed twice. This bill would have made the Montana Supreme Court’s operations more difficult by reducing the number of justices from 7 to 5. With fewer justices to take on the Court’s caseload it is inevitable that a backlog of cases would pile up. This would mean that people awaiting the Court’s decision would have to wait even longer for their case to be resolved. This bill was narrowly defeated at its second reading on Wednesday, and defeated again when it was reconsidered on Friday.

HB 464, sponsored by Rep. Paul Fielder of Thompson Falls, would have required judicial candidates to state their party affiliation when they run for office. Otherwise, this law would act like they have something to hide from voters and list them as “undisclosed” on the ballot. This bill was also defeated on the House floor last Friday.

But there are still bills to be on the lookout for. SB 302 is another proposal by Sen. Daniel Emrich. This bill would make the November general election for judges partisan. However, this would take place only after a nonpartisan primary election, creating a confusing mess for candidates, election administrators, and voters alike. This bill was passed by the Senate Judiciary Committee and is awaiting a vote on the Senate floor.

Clearly there is a lot of work being done in the Legislature to destroy the independent judicial system that Montanans have relied upon for decades.  When Montana’s judges hear cases and write opinions, they do not put on red robes or blue robes, or put a D or R behind their name. A judge’s role in our system of government is to keep the other branches “within the limits assigned to their authority”. These bills encourage justices to abandon these principals, in favor of adhering to their chosen party’s platform.

Our state deserves judges who make their decisions with regard to the law and the Constitution, not partisan affiliation or political priorities, and we applaud the lawmakers who have stood up to stop this from happening. If you agree with this sentiment, tell your legislators to vote NO on SB 302, and thank them if they voted against the bills that have been defeated.


Third Time’s a Charm? 

We know zombies are all the rage right now, but this is getting out of hand. SB 441, sponsored by Senator Mark Noland of Bigfork, attempts to revive the Ballot Interference Protection Act– a measure that has been ruled unconstitutional twice.

The original Ballot Interference Protection Act of 2017, or BIPA, made it illegal for Montanans to collect and return more than six ballots. It also imposed strict restrictions and registration requirements on people helping collect ballots. This act was ruled unconstitutional in 2020 due to its clear disenfranchisement of Native voters living on Montana reservations, who often rely on organizations like Western Native Voice to help them return their ballots to far-away elections offices. 

In 2021, legislators tried again with HB 530, which we not-so-fondly call BIPA 2.0, which prohibited anyone from collecting ballots as part of their job. Again, this primarily affected organizations like Western Native Voice and tribal community organizations who collect ballots on reservations, and again, the law was ruled unconstitutional in District Court in July 2022 as part of a $1.2 million lawsuit (paid for by taxpayers). The case will now move to the Montana Supreme Court. From the judge’s ruling: 

“The one legislator that the Secretary called to testify at trial stated that he did not study impediments on Native American voters when ballot collection is restricted, did not read the opinions finding BIPA unconstitutional, made no effort to learn why BIPA was held unconstitutional, but nonetheless supported HB 530.”

Apparently, Senator Noland can’t take a hint. His bill, SB 441, goes even further than either previous iteration of BIPA: it prohibits anyone but a family member from returning a voter’s ballot (with exceptions for election and postal workers). This is a clear attempt to further disenfranchise Native and disabled voters who rely on their communities to help them cast a ballot, and we’re not having it. Send the committee and your Senator a message asking them to vote NO on this blatantly unconstitutional bill.

If you have had someone else turn in your ballot for you OR if you have turned in a ballot for someone else, we want to hear from you! Just respond to this email.


Don’t let them define our rights away!

Could these legislators stop trying to erase trans, non-binary, Two Spirit, and intersex people at a state level?? No? Okay… This time, they’re trying to define people out of legal existence with SB 458, which would “define sex in Montana law”. We’ll just paste their definition of “sex” here:

“Sex” means the organization of the body and gametes for reproduction in human beings and other organisms. In human beings, there are exactly two sexes, male and female, with two corresponding gametes. The sexes are determined by the biological indication of male or female, including sex chromosomes, gonads, and “ nonambiguous internal and external genitalia present at birth, without regard to an individual’s psychological, chosen, or subjective experience of gender.”

Yikes. There’s a lot we could say about how wrong this definition is, not least of all, its complete biological inaccuracy. If you’re fed up with a few people trying to negate the existence of and strip away legal protections against discrimination for entire populations, send a message to the Senate Public Health, Welfare, and Safety Committee letting them know that you OPPOSE this genocidal bill.


Hero of the Week- Rep. Alice Buckley

We all know that affordable housing is one of the most pressing issues facing folks across Montana. So when Rep. Alice Buckley of Bozeman introduced HB 553, also known as the Housing for Montana Families Act, we knew she’d need to be our Hero of the Week! This bill would make several exciting changes to Montana’s zoning code, but the topline is that HB 553 would allow for accessory dwelling units, or ADUs, to be built in residential zoning districts throughout the state.

ADUs (which are smaller homes built on the same property as another residence) are often lower-cost options for people seeking affordable or multigenerational housing– and we know there are plenty of those folks in our communities right now! Despite this, their construction is either restricted or banned in much of Montana, feeding into exclusionary zoning policies that have been shown to increase racial and economic segregation. HB 553 would change that.

This legislative session, we’ve seen a handful of solutions proposed from legislators on both sides of the aisle to address our state’s housing crisis, and we’ve been excited to support a handful of great, bipartisan bills that could increase Montana’s supply of affordable, attainable housing.  HB 553 was tabled in committee immediately after its hearing on Thursday, but we know Rep. Buckley will keep putting in the work to make Montana a place where all people can thrive.


Villain of the Week- Rep. Jane Gillette  

Representative Jane Gillette is teaming up with our Week 2 Villain, DPHHS Director Charlie Brereton, to push the same illegal and unconstitutional restrictions through the legislature that Charlie is trying to mandate through the MT Department of Health & Human Services. 

Can you guess what Constitutional right this villainous duo wants to take away? 

That’s right, Rep. Gillette is putting forward a bill that would severely restrict the right to access abortion, while also violating our right to privacy. Heinous. Even worse, this bill, HB 544, would make the choice to exercise this right dependent on income, as it would aggressively restrict Medicaid coverage of abortion and increase the amount of red tape and highly invasive documentation required to prove that the abortion is “medically necessary.” 

At the committee hearing on February 22nd, we heard from human rights organizations, lawyers, and doctors in opposition to this bill (and no one in support), who noted that HB 544 would violate Montanan’s Constitutional right to procreative autonomy and harm the low-income folks who the state is under court order to provide medically necessary abortions to.  

Despite the complete lack of public support for HB 544, it was passed by the House Judiciary Committee. If you want to stop Jane’s villainy, send a message to your Representative urging them to vote NO on this harmful, unlawful, and unconstitutional bill.